Yesterday, fattening a few hundreds of grams more with a roscón and a chocolate shared with a few neighbors (accumulating share capital, I mean), we were commenting on the situation of an assumption new type of young man, which neither works neither studies, does not even strain for looking for work. He lives with his parents, who support him and pay some or many luxuries to him, but it does not strain for a future, good are worked forming, well acquiring labor experience. Apparently, they call them "not - nis" (they neither study they do not even work), and, also apparently, it would be a worrying, increasing and quite widespread phenomenon.
Yes that is worrying. It does not seem that I benefited him very much to a country to be provided with many people like that, with: parasites? voluntary or involuntary. Is it increasing? It does not even design. Is it quite widespread? The latter question we can try to answer it with the available information, this is, those of the files of microinformation of the Survey of Active Population (that can discharge here).
In the following picture I gather several young people categories from 16 to 34 years that we might consider "not - nis".
For the prompt thing, I do not include to those who in the survey are considered to be "a person of reference" or "spouse of the person of reference", this is, to that, in principle, they are those who head the hearths. And so, I concentrate almost exclusively on the "children of the person of reference", although, for mor of the finished thing, I include other categories of dependent young people (like "couple or spouse of the son of the person of reference"), very minority.
I do not also include the idle ones that have already worked. It is possible that now they are stopped (do not work) and do not study, but they have already showed in practice his disposal to work, and it is possible that they are unemployed responding to the demands of the moment, in spite of his efforts to find work.
Then, from the point of view of the employment, we would have left like possible members of the group of "not - nis" the inactive ones and stopped without previous employment. The inactive ones are those who neither are occupied they do not even look for work (that is to say, even they nor qualify like stopped). Stopped without previous employment they are those who have never worked but they are looking for work.
From the point of view of the studies, it would be necessary to bear in mind to those who do not study ruled studies and/or do not study not ruled studies. As often we think that "studying" is to study ruled studies, also I include to those who only continue a not ruled formation.
In the picture there are offered different combinations of the above mentioned categories (click in him to extend it, then, if not, they will not see anything).
In puridad, "not - nis" there would be the inactive ones that neither study ruled studies they do not even continue a not ruled formation. Those approximately 370.000 would be ó 380.000 young people from 16 to 34 years in the first half of the year (3 % of the whole), although they would raise approximately 620.000 in the third trimester of 2009 (5 %). I believe that the fact of the third trimester is not good, because the survey covers July, August and September, in which there are many students who have finished (or left) his studies, but they are not initiating a few new studies yet or do not looking for work, anything that they usually do, rather in September or October. That's why, from now on I will not use the numbers of the third trimester.
If we add the inactive ones that only continue a not ruled formation, the number of "not - nis" would promote approximately 550.000 (4,5 %).
If we add stopped without previous employment that they do not study, the number would raise approximately 680.000 (5,6 %).
If we add stopped without previous employment that only they continue a not ruled formation, the number would raise approximately 710.000 (6 %).
In the picture they have other combinations. Choose the one that more they like. Or, if they want, propose a different estimation :-)
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment